server hog造句
例句與造句
- An unintentional server hog could prove extremely costly in financial terms.
- The server load might include well known server hogs, such as system backup.
- Thus, pigs are commonly associated with road hog " or " server hog ", for example ).
- Use of a deliberate server hog is known as a denial-of-service attack, a behaviour exhibited by many crap flood.
- More often, the term server hog is used to designate an unusual load condition where the server performance falls short of the culturally accepted baseline.
- It's difficult to find server hog in a sentence. 用server hog造句挺難的
- It will not be a server hog because I will happily use database dumps ( they're as good as the real thing, right ? ).
- In such a situation, the designation of the server hog becomes a political matter of pointing fingers, as the termination of either long-running report would restore the server to normal performance.
- :My suggestion to review the contributions is to assure everyone that this bot account is performing a " very " useful service, without causing harm to articles and without being a server hog.
- In this context, a server hog most commonly designates a malicious server hog a program written expressly for the purpose of overloading a remote server with excessive requests or excessively difficult requests ( such as complex search ).
- 4.1 ) The onus is on the owner of a bot to demonstrate that the bot is harmless, is useful, is not a server hog, has been approved, and abides by all guidelines, policies and common practices.
- A "'server hog "'is a user, program or system that places excessive load on a clients is degraded, or such that the server itself is so heavily loaded that it fails to perform routine housekeeping for its own maintenance.
- However, I'd like to see the bot slowed down for two reasons : one, there is a strong presumption against bots here in general; the burden of proof is on the bot-maker to demonstrate that the bot is ( 1 ) useful, ( 2 ) harmless, and ( 3 ) not a server hog.
- Provided that safeguards are put into place ( Check if it was created as an " on wheels " page, etc ), none of the reasons for opposition to oppose above really address the core issue, and that is : Is the bot harmless ? ( I believe that it is, provided that there are safeguards ); Is it useful ? ( A no-brainer ); Is it a server hog ( No more so than TB2 ); and has it been approved ( The only point of contention ) . m L t 07 : 48, 4 June 2006 ( UTC)